Physis: A Theory of Power · Chapter 6
Hegemony
Opens your assistant with a ready-made question; the answer is produced by that assistant. Physis Project neither produces nor verifies these answers.
This chapter has not yet been published. This page is a preliminary overview; it will be replaced by the full text once the chapter is published. The canonical text is the book, which will be published upon completion.
Abstract
Hegemony is the answer given to the question "Why should I rule you?" The chapter sets out the six types of hegemony, the frame-setting function of ideological hegemony, capitalism as the ideology of the capital-centered corporate entity, submission, and the two paths into full hegemonic degeneration.
Concepts used in this work 5
Hegemony is the answer given to the question "Why should I rule you?" There is no essential difference between domination and consent; the carrot and the stick belong to the same hegemony. The question is asked not only by the upper class but by every power class. The aim is the same at every scale: to be decisive and "to remain."
Hegemony does not seize the will but the command over its use. Its limit is the source, because a system cannot destroy what it needs in order to exist. Whether a hegemony is real or manipulative appears only when it is tested. Of its six types, source and coercive hegemony outrank the rest because they touch existence itself, yet human beings can reverse that order for the sake of meaning. The types accumulate from bottom to top and make the system structurally prone to authoritarianism.
Ideological hegemony sets the frame in which the question is asked. Capitalism is the ideology of the capital-centered corporate entity; it is experienced not as an ideology but as "how the world works," and it operates beneath other ideologies. Liberalism freezes the existing distribution of hegemony by blocking fraternity. Submission is usually rational but never final: resistance can be suppressed, but not erased.
When a will-centered system loses the obligation to protect its source, it enters full hegemonic degeneration. Reached by suppression, this opens onto collapse; reached by substitution, onto extinction. The most monopolized state is also the most fragile. Capital-centered structures have no counterpart to it; there the path leads to corporate distillation or to loss of direction. Separation of powers does not prevent singularization; it spreads it over time. Plurality is not a point reached but a balance that must be held.